We in addition to desired to observe how risk-delivering size had been about works characteristics thereby expected the newest players in our data to suggest as to the extent the things they’re doing is defined due to the fact ranged, high-risk and you can/otherwise physically demanding. The root hypothesis try one a broad readiness to take chances might possibly be mirrored from inside the assortment of really works (Look for Zuckerman 2007 ).
Tries and you will secret details
The central point contained in this investigation was to top learn man’s general thinking on exposure-providing, how they are affected by socio-demographic background and you may identity and just how he is shown in more certain risk-bringing perceptions and behavior.
Penned on the web:
Q1. How will be solutions distributed on every of your risk size? All of our hypothesis here is that (H1) folks are typically exposure averse while the distribution regarding responses could well be skewed into the chance averse part of the measure.
Q2. What’s the relatives between the risk size and you may market details? Considering prior to lookup i asked one to (H2) boys would be a great deal more ready to bring dangers than simply females and you will young more happy than simply elderly people. We had zero particular hypotheses about the almost every other socio-group parameters.
Q3. What’s the relation between the chance-getting proportions and you will personality? Centered on intuitions together with prior to look i expected because our hypothesis (H3) you to definitely risk-taking attitudes could well be surely correlated which have an excellent) Feelings Trying to and its own subscales, that have b) Extraversion and you can Psychoticism of one’s EPQ scale and you will c) having Extraversion and Openness so you’re able to the event for the Larger Four scale.
Q4. What is the family between your exposure proportions and you will functions qualities? We questioned right here you to definitely (H4) risk-taking attitudes will be seriously coordinated that have variety of functions you to definitely try ranged, risky and you can/otherwise real.
Q5. What is the family members between your chance dimensions and you can desire to help you be involved in dangerous affairs? We requested one (H5) risk-delivering thinking might be undoubtedly connected with willingness as productive from inside the risky sport, high-risk work and risky military surgery.
Q6. Exactly what are the most critical predictors of risk-getting? I expected right here (H6) the hypothesized character traits and additionally sex and many years could be the most significant predictors.
Point and methods
Studies was obtained because of the Ipsos Lookup Institute, a worldwide organization with ISO9001 and you will ISO 202252 permits. Investigation was indeed obtained while in the a month or more into the . The respondents had been employed on the business’s very own databases, which has most of the joined cell phone numbers in the Norway, plus mobiles. Number were picked for the a lotto base while the interviewers asked toward person in your family, regarding 15 years or a lot more than, whoever birthday are second. To reach step one,one hundred thousand complete interview twenty two,355 everyone was called that have a maximum of 61,916 calls. Of them contacted nine,567 answered and you can twelve,788 did not. A maximum of 1,100000 respondents next completed the device interviews, hence endured just as much as you are moments. The new impulse rate from those contacted was four % and you may out of those who responded ten percent. Whilst the response pricing is always to optimally were highest, a deeper check unearthed that the new try fulfilled conditions to own representativity into the selected variables. The last try obtained well. Many years try compiled in many years. For ages fifteen–twenty-four many years the brand new decide to try attained 82% of your own society objective, 25–39 age 109%, 40–forty-two many years 90%, 50–59 years 112%, 60–69 decades 110%, as well as for 70 + age 94%. Although the attempt obtained well to your years and other history details, we might underline which our use of the phrase ‘brand new population’ or ‘new Norwegian population’ on the post have to be drawn with warning because of the representativity concern.